Skip to content

Are Participant Demographics the Most Useful Single Measure of Community Impact?

Category: Community Engagement & Impact
Dark theatre with black seats - each seat is empty put has a number on the back of the seat.
Photo by Adi Goldstein on Unsplash

Nina Simon explores some key pros and cons to relying on participant demographics to measure a museum’s community impact.

“Attendance may not be a signifier of deep impact, but it is the clearest way that people tell you whether they care or not about your offerings.”

-Nina Simon

Let's say you want your organization to be rooted in your community. To be of value to your community. To reflect and represent your community. To help your community grow stronger. What indicator would determine the extent to which your organization fulfills these aspirations? Here's a candidate: participant demographics.

Continue Reading at Museumtwo

AAM Member-Only Content

AAM Members get exclusive access to premium digital content including:

  • Featured articles from Museum magazine
  • Access to more than 1,500 resource listings from the Resource Center
  • Tools, reports, and templates for equipping your work in museums
Log In

We're Sorry

Your current membership level does not allow you to access this content.

Upgrade Your Membership


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Field Notes!

Packed with stories and insights for museum people, Field Notes is delivered to your inbox every Monday. Once you've completed the form below, confirm your subscription in the email sent to you.

If you are a current AAM member, please sign-up using the email address associated with your account.

Are you a museum professional?

Are you a current AAM member?

Success! Now check your email to confirm your subscription, and please add to your safe sender list.