This visual Data Story is based on findings from the 2025 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers, a national survey of American museum visitors from AAM and Wilkening Consulting. Every year, the survey partners with individual museums to research their audiences and yield insights about their behaviors and preferences, both on an institutional and national level. (Learn more about the purpose and methodology of the survey here.) Interested in joining the 2026 edition? Sign up by December 1 to unlock a special early bird rate!

---

Jump to the text version

---

---

When we look at visitation gaps among the broader population, there are two big things to consider: incidence and frequency.

Incidence is a binary yes/no question: has someone been to a museum (of any type) in the past year? We measure incidence by doing broader population sampling among US adults.

Frequency is different, and looks at how often someone has been to museums in a defined time period.

When we field the Annual Survey of Museum-Goers, the respondents are overwhelmingly frequent museum-goers.

Our simplified definition of these individuals is that they are engaged enough with one (or more) museums to be on a communications list (email, social media, etc.) and then complete a survey on a museum’s behalf. We do assess their frequency, and virtually all respondents are what we would define as frequent museum-goers.

In contrast, our broader population sampling of US adults helps us understand more casual and sporadic visitors to museums, who engage with museums less often. Casual visitors typically visit at least one museum a year, while sporadic museum-goers may visit museums every couple/few years.

When we examine the demographic characteristics across these different frequencies, however, we find that there are significant differences. That is, the demographic profile of frequent museum-goers is a bit different than the profile of all museum-goers, especially casual and sporadic visitors.

Understanding these gaps (and where gaps don’t exist) is important, because it gives us a much more nuanced understanding of who museums are reaching, and how deeply.

There are three demographic factors that we want to examine more completely.

Educational Attainment

Among frequent museum-goers, 83% of respondents have a college degree; that’s 2.3x the rate of college degrees among US adults (36%).

But when we look at incidence among the broader population, we see a much smaller gap. Among all casual and sporadic museum goers, 47% have a college degree, and 53% do not.

It turns out a lot people without college degrees do go to museums, they are just more likely to be casual or sporadic visitors rather than frequent visitors.

Percent of each population segment who visited a museum in the past year:

• 47% College degree
• 33% Some college/technical school/associate degree
• 20% High school diploma/GED or less

Race and Ethnicity

Among frequent museum-goers, 84% say that they (or a member of their household) identify as white. In contrast, 57% of people living in the United States identify as white (not Hispanic or Latine).

Again, it would be easy to make a big assumption here. But the accurate conclusion from this is that yes, frequent museum-goers are significantly more likely to identify as white than the broader population.

Incidence tells a very different story.

For the fourth year in a row, Asian or Asian American have been the most likely racial or ethnic group to have visited a museum. Additionally, since 2023, African American and Hispanic or Latine incidence has held steady. 2025 was the first year that a stable sample of Native American/American Indian or Alaska Natives was collected, with about a third indicating at least one visit.

Percent of each population segment who visited a museum in the past year:

• 27% African American or Black
• 42% Asian or Asian American
• 33% Hispanic or Latine
• 35% Native American/American Indian or Alaska Native
• 35% White (not Hispanic or Latine)

(Responses by other racial and ethnic groups were too small to be stable.)

Additionally, and this has been true for the past several years, white people are the most likely to say they “never” visit museums, while people of color are more likely to say they visit museums at least occasionally.

Surprised? We were too when we first saw a closing, and then erasure of the incidence gap several years ago, and we wondered if it was a fluke. But after years of consistent data, we are now confident a new pattern has emerged.

The frequency gap we see by race and ethnicity among frequent museum-goers is incredibly persistent, but we have some good news here as well. Since 2017, it has been decreasing, albeit slowly.

Frequent museum-goers from the Annual Survey of Museum-Goers: % white respondents since 2017:

• 2017: 92%
• 2021: 87%
• 2025: 84%

(From 2017 to 2023, the white [not Hispanic or Latine] population of the US decreased from 62% to 57%.)

A victory lap? Not so fast!

Incidence gaps do still persist by museum type and for specific museums.

By museum types, historic sites in particular have persistently high incidence and frequency gaps, with audiences still, overall, skewing disproportionately white.

Additionally, this still varies widely for individual museums. Your museum may still be facing an incidence gap, and only research specific to your museum can help you understand where your gaps are (or are not).

Age and Life Stage

Some museum types deliberately focus on families with minor children (children’s museums and, to a lesser extent, zoos, aquaria, and science centers), and these museums don’t tend to see frequency gaps (or incidence gaps) by age that are of significant concern…though they often see frequency gaps with young adults without children.

But it is a different story for art museums, history organizations, and botanical gardens. It is incredibly common for the majority of their frequent museum-goers to be over the age of 60.

This, understandably, can cause a great deal of concern for people working in these types of museums. And that’s why looking at incidence is so important.

It turns out, adults over 60 are the least likely segment of the population to visit museums (a pattern we have seen pretty consistently over the past several years). We actually underserve them.

Percent of each population segment who visited a museum in the past year:

• 33% Young adults (under 40, no children)
• 44% Parents/guardians of minor children
• 27% 40 – 59, no minor children
• 26% 60 or older

Additionally, those casual and sporadic young adult visitors visit most museum types, lagging behind the overall average only for children’s museums and zoos/aquaria (largely because, well, they don’t have children; this shifts when some of them start families, of course!).

But overall, at this time, we don’t have significant concerns about the long-term pipeline of future visitors to museums of any type.

---

Annual Survey of Museum-Goers Data Stories are created by Wilkening Consulting on behalf of the American Alliance of Museums. Sources include:

• 2025 Annual Survey of Museum-Goers, n = 98,904; 202 museums participating
• 2025 Broader Population Sampling, n = 2,079
• 2017 – 2024 Annual Surveys of Museum-Goers
• US demographic data from the U.S. Census Bureau

*Data Stories share research about both frequent museum-goers (typically visit multiple museums each year) and the broader population (including casual, sporadic, and non-visitors to museums). See the Purpose and Methodology (Update) Data Story from September 11, 2025 for more information on methodology.

Data Story release date: September 18, 2025

© 2025 Wilkening Consulting, LLC

https://wilkeningconsulting.com/data-stories/
https://wilkeningconsulting.com/methodology-2025/